[donger]

[ QUOTE ]

Scenario I: I 3-bet preflop and he calls. I autobet the flop.

Scenario II: I call preflop and checkraise his autobet.

Count the bets in each scenario. There is no lost value. The pot size is the same in each case and Villain must make a decision about my flop aggression.

What are the differences between the two approaches?


[/ QUOTE ]

I think that people see more turns when checkraised than they do when 3-bet and led into.

The problem I am having with the never-threebet strategy is that your threebet and flop autobet is going to be causing incorrect folds from the villain on flops you don't have the stomach to checkraise. I think by being passive and NOT taking the intiative, you are giving him opportunities to easily outplay you with the autobet.

If you take the intiative, you're going to win all the pots like this that you would normally lose:
You: 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
Opp: 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

flop: A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

Are you checkraising flops like these?