[POKhER]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Im playing Absolute and there are few rocks. I was suprised that there was so much fish. The 2/4 and 3/6 are pretty much the same and at both i have yet to spot a good player.

Most of the time there is maniac, some fish and some weak-tight guy. If you just take the time to get a good read on them its a goldmine.

[/ QUOTE ]

I played at absolute for a bit, there arn't "so much fish". If you think there are, go to party...

You'll soon see what "so many fish" look like.

[/ QUOTE ]
BTW, aren't you the one who told me to learn to play against the TAG's otherwise when the fish leaves I might get burned too? [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah i think i did, and i stand by this. I'm currently at party for a bonus but returning to a tighter site where the players are tough.

Im tempted to go prima as i got slaughtered by those guys! I think it sprobably varience and my brains tricking me and not the actual change in players however i found a whole loads of tricky lags there!

About winrate vs bonus etc. I'm not sure whats most profitable...

I think you can 4-8table party and still have a respectable win rate so a higher BB/HR. At absolute due to it being tight your win rate is reduced and you can't 8table.

I think party outweighs absolute and for many of the people here who are rushing to get cash or to higher levels (and in doing so not learning as much about note taking, reads and whatever else) will be best suited for party interms of cash made.

Depends on what your goals are i guess, i want to get to 5/10 sure, but i also want to play perfect poker(im a perfectionist).