Hey Ladies and Gents. It's time for a session study again. For those of you who have no idea what I'm talking about the original setup was posted
HERE
For a quick overview.
-- Session studies are where we send a complete sesion to another poster and get a session from a different poster. We all then do reviews on the full session and discuss with our sender what they can work on and with our reviewer what they think we should work on.
-- A session is 100-200 consecutive hands (don't omit preflop folds or your bad plays) so the reviewer can get a feel for your play and help you find leaks.
-- I do this every two weeks so if you can't join this time then maybe next time.
How it all works:
You PM me sometime BEFORE 5PM EST Monday afternoon if you have a session for review this week. Have the PM be something like "I'm in", or "session reviews are sexy", or "Nomadtla is my favorite poster"
I take them all and set people up with a reviewer and someone for them to review.
I will PM you back with your reviewer. I will also post the full list in this thread if you do not hear from me.
You then PM your reviewer and get their Email address, and give your Email adress to the person you are reviewing.
Durring the course of next week you send a session to your reviewer and discuss what they think of it.
You also recieve a session from your sender and you review it and discuss it with them.
Then in three weeks (I am taking the new years weekend off from this as I think we all will have busy Holidays and need to recouperate [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]) we will do it all again. So you have a little extra time to discuss with people and so we stay on the same timeframe as the SSSH crowd.
Those who have done this in the past seem to enjoy it and many feel it is helping them. So if you're interested send me a PM. Please put any questions you might have as well as comments on what you've thought of this or how it's helped into this thread.
BTW if you play 6-max Numeri is doing this as well in SSSH his thread can be found
Here .
Edited: to adjust my reference to the time of the next one.