[ QUOTE ]
I think what both of you said are pretty obvious. But against people who are raising many hands and likely do not have much to pay off with I am not sure they are worth it, obv. this is read dependent. Shouldn't I be more likely to limp w/PPs at a tight/aggressive and loose/passive table instead of loose/aggressive tables?

[/ QUOTE ]

If its really a table where most of your opponents are loose-aggresive, online at the $200 NL level, I would get up and find another table. However, in my experience, there are not many good LAGs per table, and even against them, a set is a nice hidden hand that can pay off very well.