[Steve Giufre]

[ QUOTE ]
Agree 100% - She raised on the end b/c she thinks her hand is good and doesn't care if BK happens to have a hand that can call. She would expect to win the hand without showing most of the time and keep pushing BK around.
Yes he could have 77 but alot of hands that beat hers would have come to life earlier and she is aware of this.
Shnields: he is capable of playing a Jack like this but we are talking about the long run.
Someone said she would have just called with TT - wow it was nothing but a donk bet and she would have raised with all made hands above A5 IMO.
In the long run she gets paid with the best hand regardless if it's A5 vs 44 or TT vs 77
Mike

[/ QUOTE ]

She thinks she has a better hand and doesnt care if he can call or not? That makes no sense. Give BK a range of hands, and come back and tell me how many of those hands he can call her raise with that she beats. Thats assuming that he actually pays of her river raise with hands like 33 and 44, which BTW seem like the only hands he (might) be able to pay her with. She also has no reason to put him on either of these hands since he would probably almost always folds them from UTG+1 and Im sure she knows this. The rest of the hands in his range are just busted draws or hands she doesnt beat.

So please explain why she raised the river for value when like 90 percent of BK's hands are either busted draws or hands that beat A5.