[tdomeski]

[ QUOTE ]
b/c his hand is pretty transparent with the limp-call?

[/ QUOTE ]

to me, yes; to villian, i'm not sure...if he can win pots without flopping sets vs the villian then obviously this is a call...but if that's the case he doesn't really need a hand anyways, right?

[ QUOTE ]
b/c 22 gets set over setted more often then others?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah...if he puts villian on a pocket pair with his preflop raise then that's definitely a factor to consider...also how far will villian go with a pair after the flop if he too doesn't flop a set. All points that need to be considered

It really comes down to what is hero going to do the 7/8 times he doesn't flop a set? If he's playing the "no set no bet" type of poker then he is better off just folding in my opinion with 22...

He's got to get a ton of action when does flop a set and his set has to be good...i think hero overestimated how much he may get when he flops a set...i think a lot of people do that with hands like 22, 33, and 44

Anyways just my thoughts...could be wrong.

P.S.

[ QUOTE ]
are you from georgia?

[/ QUOTE ]

yes, sophomore at UGA