[Chobohoya]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Astro, that shouldn't matter since even if Josh leaves, his next session gets grouped in the stats (if I understand correctly). This would only matter if Josh tilts.

[/ QUOTE ]

It should matter. If you quit early to lock up a win, and "play through your downswings," then you're going to have a smaller winrate, and the center of your distribution will be more to the left than it could be.

[/ QUOTE ]

If Josh wins his first hand and quits immediately, then plays again later, then will the hands from his second session be put in the same block as his first hand?

If so, then it doesn't matter if Josh locks up his wins.

If Josh's one hand forms its own block, then that's different -- but I don't think that's what is happening.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok you're right about that. However, what I think Astro was getting at and I know I was, is that people play longer when they are losing. Over a large sample, this is going to mean that you play more hands when you: have a worse image, a tougher table, less confidence, etc. If you put more hours in with a lesser expectation, you move your curve to the left. If you practice excellent game selection without regard to your immediate results (aka don't tilt - just like you said) then your point stands. Many people do not do this.