[scdavis0]

I didn't call the flop a no brainer check..

About the turn.. it would be an unbelievable and ridiculous parlay to put the original raiser on exactly a hand such as AK, call, beat the all-in guy, and get a blank river to scoop the whole pot

I was so sure that most of the comments would be.. that was a nice/interesting play by the original raiser.. I never thought that EVERYONE would advocate calling a $180 all in with unimproved JJ on a Q9xQ board into a dry sidepot

I guess that results oriented thinking is truly mind numbingly powerful..

The original raiser actually had QQ for quads. I was sort of dumbfounded by the play he had made. When I saw the other guy's hand my mind began to wonder about the merits of making the same play with hands that are probably beating the all-in donk but may be trailing mine. I thought the correct calculation of the sidepots with a split was a nice touch. Sorry if anyone feels misled.

My intention was not to make anyone look silly.. but this thread got so ridiculous so fast..

hand history numbers will not be provided upon request