Re: Is panspermia a scienctific theory?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm pleased to see support for my earlier insistance that panspermia is a scientific theory (in contrast to ID) in the fact that a summary of the status of this theory is in the current edition of "Scientific American".
[/ QUOTE ]
Ha, knew it. I've come to the conclusion that any explanation for anything, so long as God isn't involved, can be made scientific, even FSM.
[/ QUOTE ]
Explanations for God can be considered scientific; Christian Science, ID, etc. It's all in the eyes of the beholder.
|