[Nick C]

Hmm, let's see.

If he's got AA, you have 2 outs to a win and 6-8 outs to a chop. So let's call that a little over 5 outs.

Versus KK, you've got 2 outs to a win and 2 outs to a chop. So that's 3 outs.

Versus QQ-TT, you have 4 outs to a win and 4 outs to a chop for 6 outs. Versus 88 you have 3-4 outs to a win and 3-4 outs to a chop.

Versus AK, you're in huge trouble but have 2-3 outs to a chop, so long as Villain doesn't already have a royal that he's planning to show to the table after you fold.

Versus 99, you have 3-4 outs to a win and two outs to a chop.

On some cards (like the 9 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]) you run the risk of either getting bluffed out on the river or losing another bet, depending on your plan. (And, versus this opponent I doubt you have any bluffing outs.)

I probably would have peeled, but I think I prefer your fold.

Edit: If Villain has been playing like a LAG postflop, though, then I agree with gehrig and think you should call down.