Re: session review, SSSH style
I have come over from the dark side. I agree.
[ QUOTE ]
I disagree as well. I think even D players can catch mistakes made by A players. Even if they're not mistakes, it forces the A players to think and defend their position, to the benefit of both. If there are, hypothetically, 1000 things to do right in poker, and an A player does 900 of them right, a Be player does 800, etc, there are no guarantees that the A player is doing everything right that the B player is doing.
[/ QUOTE ]
Matter of fact I had begun to agree even before I finished typing out my post. [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]
[ QUOTE ]
On the other hand I guess I get the best of both worlds - someone to critique my session and then someone to tell me how far off base I am when I screw up the critique of their's.
[/ QUOTE ]
either the way the point is to get the discussion going, not who benefits the most? If I tell you "raise the flop, fold the turn" and you prove to me that "fold the flop, raise the turn" is better, what do I care if I'm the reviewer or the reviewee. Thanks all.
|