Thread: Too Passive?
View Single Post
  #6  
Old 12-01-2005, 12:58 PM
krimson krimson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: wwdsd
Posts: 559
Default Re: Too Passive?

[ QUOTE ]
I'm rather convinced I should be 3 betting this turn. The only hand played this way imo is QJ. There are a ton of other combos I beat here.

[/ QUOTE ]
I agree with you somewhat after thinking it through. It's hard to put him on a realistic range that has us beat. QJ/Q7s/77 are "realistic".

I also have a hard time putting him on a range that he plays this aggressively that we have beat though. Q9, Q8s, Q6s? JT? Q9 and Q8 are very reasonable but anything else seems somewhat questionable even for a fish.

Are we ahead here 66%+ such that risking being raised back and not being able to fold still retains it's value?

Any chance your thoughts on this hand are affected by the outcome? ("I knew I should have ... syndrome").
Reply With Quote