[jkkkk]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Standard, though I hope your pushing that turn if someone bets.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm torn between calling the active villain again, and pushing. I dont mind the other guy staying in. And there arent *too* many cards that I dont like to see (a J or a T spring to mind, and maybe an A, but only non-diamond versions).

[/ QUOTE ]

I think push is superior because

1. Calling villain could be on the bigger flush draw.

2. Raising villain could have AK

It is a horrible way to play a set unless he knows you are going to bet a draw on the turn, but oh well, next hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

Im going broke on a diamond, so if he does have A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]X[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] then c'est la vie. But if he has a draw, then I dont mind him staying in the pot, because most of the time he is drawing stone dead.

If Raising villain has AK, then I dont want to raise and push him off it. What if the river bricks ... and he checks ... and I get to represent a missed flush who is now bluff-pushing?

Im not sure I like raising, if I will lose AK and a lower [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] draw, then is it not a bad play to raise?

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, I think that is indeed a big if, maybe you do lose them, maybe you don't. Maybe you see the bigger flush draw more times than you see a smaller one, your certainly not getting any more money from a draw on the river though.

Also pushing gets all of raising villains $ in (if he calls) but if you call and the river is a [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] then you lose a lot of value to AK.

I guess arguments can be made for both cases, but I simply like pushing because there are a lot of river cards that make both villains fold + they can outdraw you.