[tjh]

I do not think Juicy is a bot.

I am infuriated that we do not get some hand histories here to help show not-bot behavior. The check-raise all-in that was posted. That is advanced Bot behavior, if it is a bot.

I do think that Juicy messed up by teaming the account. Probably had multiple log in attempts or frequent geographic jumps that did not add up. Teaming an account and mistakes made implementing that plan probably got his account investigated.

He messed up. Maybe not by using AI but he messed up. He should confess to the teaming on the accounts and see how things go from there.

I do not think that the bots have made a jump to such high profit margins. Last I heard the bots were making pennies at ring games. Maybe SNG's are a bit easier than ring games but I still doubt that this sort of profitability is possible by a bot.

I see no proof of BOTness.

Many games, two players can do that.

The timing of mouseclicks. HearSay, I want to know how many mouseclicks, how many milliseconds and by what clock.

Staying at the 20's and not moving up.. A human can do that.
Geeze it takes a bazillion games to show Irie that you are not losing in the loooong run. So what is wrong with playing many hands at a level?


If he wants to prove that he is not a bot and he has PokerTracker he merely has to show a wide variety of play given similar situations. I know , I know a bot can be programmed to be somewhat random but once a bot hits profitability I imagine that the programmers would not bother getting too fancy. I mean if adding the stop and go made you .0001 % more money ..big deal.

So find some check raises, some flexible blind defense that shows some creative thinking and email that to party and see what they say.

It is possible that the investigators are technically backwards and do not understand poker, computers, or much of anything. So convincing them could be dificult.

--
tjh