Re: NFL running backs
[ QUOTE ]
Um, yeah, 1236 and 1335 aren't very good years for running backs that get the ball 339 times,
[/ QUOTE ]
How about for backs that are either their team's only offensive threat and/or are stacked up versus?
Also, carrying the ball 339 times isn't a detriment. Many back can't handle the ball that often. Adding in the about 400 yards receiving each year makes your statement more than laughable. 1700 NFL yards could never be considered subpar or terrible, unless only measured versus his own lofty standards.
|