Re: 1st vs. 2nd vs. 3rd
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
tried reading the faq, and I couldn't find the answer...
should your 1st vs. 2nd vs. 3rd percentage be roughly equivalent in the long run, or do good players have an uneven distribution that is top-weighted by, say, more than 1%?
[/ QUOTE ]
i've highlighted the appropriate word for me.
should is too stupid. if you're making money you're making money.
others have gone in to the topic of playing style heavilly influencing this subject, and i'm not going to go in to it deeper. there are different styles that work, and some of them make different ITM distributions.
c
[/ QUOTE ]
As my second post indicates, I'm interested in what kind of distribution is attainable/optimal.
|