Re: Differences in random number generators
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, I'm being a nit but your "estimate" of 52! is severely flawed. You're off by a solid 23 digits (which accounts for LOTS of arrangements). Looks like you're dealing from a 38 card deck.
For completeness sake
52! =
80658175170943878571660636856403766975289505440883 277824000000000000
your original estimate
130000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
[/ QUOTE ]
That's a pretty freaking serious number screw-up on my part. I got that estimate from an article on deck possibilities. Yuck.
|