Re: Does it require faith?
"Next dice shooters will have a selective memory just like poor poker players. They will recall the times they tried to roll a ten and were successful and forget the times they sevened out. Just like a poker player who only remembers when his aces got cracked not the 80% of the time they won heads up."
According to Sharpshooter, he has recorded tens of thousands of throws of the dice.
"To continue, physics as determined by our universe added to the capacity of a human to throw a perfectly repetitive set of dice which will encounter random angles, obstructions and air flow simply prove that controlled dice throwing is a scam and not possible."
Based on these criteria, you cannot say that it is "not possible." Not possible is an assumption. All of these things make it a difficult endeavor indeed but it is a leap in logic on your part to label it impossible.
"Throw the dice in a casino one million times, record every roll, have three unbiased witnesses and get back to me with your results."
Did you play one million hands of blackjack before you believed in card counting?
"To summarize if you (or anyone) could effect the dice to any measurable manner your fat little ass would be out on the craps tables right now making a fortune not trying to prove it by use of persuasive techniques and cute little anecdotes on an online forum."
I don't live in Las Vegas and I don't want to play craps for a living. This is ridiculous logic. That's like saying, "If card counting works then you would be in Vegas right now making a fortune."
I hope you realize that everything that you have said in your post is an assumption.
"It's probably selective memory."
"There are too many variables."
"You need to roll a million times first."
"If it worked, you'd be in Vegas right now."
None of these are concrete arguments.
|