Re: A note on the idea of WAWB
[ QUOTE ]
Here's one with the same flop but a different situation. A TAG raises, you 3-bet KK, and he caps. Let's say his capping range is AA-JJ, AK. The flop comes AA2, same as last hand. This time though, you're ahead of QQ-JJ (12 combinations), chopping with KK (1 combination), and behind to AA/AK (9 combinations). Assuming he will continue to bet all of those hands, the WAWB line should be applied here because a raise will only get 3-bet by a hand that has you crushed, but you don't want to fold because you have QQ/JJ crushed.
[/ QUOTE ]
Aren't we only behind to 5 hands here - the other AA, and 4 combos of AK? I'm sure I'm missing something here - set me straight.
|