Re: The arguement that recently convinced me of god\'s existence
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
He solves no mysteries is all I am saying.
[/ QUOTE ]
He solves the mystery William Paley used as the basis for his Watchmaker argument. (Actually, Dawkins doesn't solve it. Darwin and Wallace solved it. Dawkins describes the solution.)
[/ QUOTE ]
So this text needs a context to understand his reason for writing it? His preface is misleading (to me) is basically what I am getting at.
|