[pooh74]

[ QUOTE ]
Well, the name of this forum is "1-table Tournaments", not SNG Tournaments. So, maybe that answers the question. I agree with others, however, that two-table SNG questions would be better answered by 1-table tournament players than MTT players. I'm not so sure but what 3- and 5-table SNG questions might be appropriate for this forum. Maybe the trouble is really with the forum name.

[ QUOTE ]
The 180-players SNGs should certainly be in the MTT forum.

[/ QUOTE ]

I recently played in my first 180-player SNG at PS. I enjoyed the experience and will likely try it again soon. I'm curious about others' experiences in them. How well did your general 1-table strategy work in the 20-table game? For those with experience in both MTT and STT, did you find it more like a MTT or a STT? (I think this is on-topic since I'm really curious about the STT player's take on the 180 player games.)

[/ QUOTE ]

Its more like a typical MTT...hands down. I havent fared well so far but have a ridiculously small sample (25-30?).

The thing I like is being able to indulge my MTT habit when I want to, instead of being on their schedule. I simply play some STTs while doing so, as I dont think I could devote full attention to just this MTT w/o shooting myself.

But anyway, the point is, at no time does this tourney feel like an STT...nor should it.