Re: Vatican Astronomer Debunks ID
Where you been doug? Haven’t seen you in a while.
Anyway, I will say that your analogy is definitely more like the discussion here than mine. I think though, yours has at least this one flaw when describing how the discussion should begin. Let’s talk about this one flaw first then we can analyze the rest.
[ QUOTE ]
It's slightly LESS EXTREMELY unlikely that there is a wall.
[/ QUOTE ]
How do you come to this likelihood? I say we objectively should start at 50/50. (We might have to change the analogy from wall to say the wind and which direction it comes from if the blind don't know which direction they are facing - or some other type of movement - a wall isn't exact to the situation.)
RJT
p.s. We'll start a new thread on this if you agree it needs refining.
|