Re: my take on the new Harry Potter movie
[ QUOTE ]
i haven't read the book, but as a 'movie watcher' i thought it was way too jumpy. they apparently didn't have the time to stop and smell the roses on any of the would-be cooler elements, it was just like introduction-use-exit over and over. i think the third movie would stand up if it had nothing to do with the potter franchise. this one would crash and burn if it was called "child wizards deluxe part 4"
[/ QUOTE ]
the better books are way too long and detailed to make into conventional-length movies. this effect was there in 3, but much more pronounced in 4.
|