Re: What could Dannenman have put Hachem on in the last hand?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't know if this has been mentioned yet, but I'm sure some of the players criticizing Dannenman's play are the same ones who criticized Farha's laydown of his top pair against Moneymaker.
The way that played out, Farha's top pair didn't look like the best hand at all. If he calls, he wins the WSOP.
I can't really defend the play beyond that, but I think it's worth noting a similiar situation from just two years ago.
[/ QUOTE ]
I remember that hand between Moneymaker and Farha. I don't remember exactly how it played out, but I seem to recall it was a pure bluff by Moneymaker on the river, though he was shooting at the pot the whole hand. I remember thinking it was a very reasonable laydown by Farha, and a rather reckless play by Moneymaker.
[/ QUOTE ]
what not a calculated, aggressive play by moneymaker? this forum has this pervasive attitude that moneymaker can do no right. if he put farha on a foldable hand, it was just a great, "balls of steel" bluff. just trying to give credit where credits due.
|