Re: Argument for God
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Discuss problems with my premises..
[/ QUOTE ]
Seriously? Your logic is valid, of course. I'll discuss your premises briefly:
¬P
¬Q
¬R
¬[](P --> Q)
¬[](¬R --> ¬Q)
( "[]" = "necessarily" )
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't even see why we need the modality--I would think:
~(P --> Q)
and
~(~R --> ~Q)
are both true.
|