[theweatherman]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
"from each according to their abilities, to each according to their needs"

jobs based on aptitude

"ethnographic data indicated that hunter-gatherers worked far fewer hours and enjoyed more leisure than typical members of industrial society, and they still ate well"

less work with same gain.

please dont make me repaet myself anymore

[/ QUOTE ]

I'll repeat myself again, we're not debating the ideal, only the impossibility.

[/ QUOTE ]

how is what i posted impossible?

[/ QUOTE ]

The selfishness, etc. we were talking about earlier. And the sheer number of people (that hasn't been brought up yet).

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok, for the last time, humans have not been proven to be inately selfish, if anything i have presetned evidence to the contrary. Untill you can prove that humans are born with a bulit in drive to gbe as selfish as possibleplease do not use that as a reason to debunk a communist society.

Scale is a good point, however, as I mentioned earlier I am no communist and there fore do not have all the answers (only most [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] ) I am unsure how to acomidate the massive scaleof a worldwide communist system, although Im sure there are some who are able to
.