Re: Sites Have Motivation to Reward Poor Players. Period.
One skilled, long-term multi-tabler, pays as much rake perhaps as at least two or three single-tabling fish.
This has been discussed before. I've always maintained that it was in the poker-room's best interests to keep feeding the sharks.
Since there are alot of paranoid freaks out there, I don't see the poker-rooms screwing with their algorithims too much, but I could be wrong. I don't think it's in any sites' best interest to have it where nobody wins except in the short term.
Mostly, I disagree with what you posted. Pokerstars support has it right. Here's your homework assignment:
Go back into PT and look at your flop and turn winning %'s for those string of bad beats. How bad off were you really? Remember, a poker-player who is dishonest with themself is a losing player, so please avoid stretching the truth at all.
|