[BluffTHIS!]

You have let NR off the hook too easily. He is basically saying that he would wish non-believers to take christianity on faith, but also to be content with an imprecise definition of the doctrines of that faith and the fact that there is a plethora of competing explanations, not about details, but regarding fundmanetal matters relating to salvation.

His statement that there is not any difference between catholic theology and protestant theology in regards to fundamental doctrines regarding salvation can't be correct because of the New Guinea question, and because he has shown in previous posts that he believes that someone who hears the gospel preached really can't honestly not believe it to be true.

Of course if you try to pin him down logically on a certain thing, you most likely will get the response that logic is merely "human reason", as if arithmetic were as well.