[Wheatsauce]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Also...what is the difference between raising a raiser and re-raising a raiser?

[/ QUOTE ]

All that was said was raise/bet/re-raise the raiser, which is perfectly valid. You bet into an empty field, raise a better and reraise a raiser. There is no logical flaw.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well it depends how you translate it as far as whether or not it is a logical flaw, although I'll admit upon closer reading that your translation is just as good as mine (raise/call/reraise as a blanket statement for "a raiser").

However, if you take it your way, then the "a raiser" part is superfluous. Who else would you re-raise?