i personally use it to improve my short handed game in full ring now, although overall i probably would have played more 6m hands than fr because i only made the switch to fr a month or two ago.

ive always thought that it would be harder to multitable effectively at 6m and would make you more prone to errors. further you have to be totally tilt free as even the slightest frustration running 6 tables of 6m would cost you.... a lot.

anyone have any thoughts on this aspect?

lets say your beating 6m at 1BB/100 and fr for 1BB/100. but 6m one table goes through 150 hands in the time fr does 100. so basically your ratio is 1.5:1 for 6m being more profitable.

even if this was the case.... i still think it would be so much easier to multitable 8 fr tables than to multitable even 3 6m ones, which would make fr tables still more profitable?

anyone know what the real numbers are like and how this affects the reasoning to actually play 6m for cash? (currently i only 6m for skill development)