Re: Zeroing in on free will
This situation is useless as a hypothetical problem. It is designed so restrictively as to be virtually meaningless. It's like saying, if some wildly improbable situation with no possibility of being proven or carried out were to occur, what would it mean? If free will indeed exists, then there is no way the person and his doppelganger reach identical situations twenty years down the road. If there is anything random about molecules and physics, this situation would never occur. If this situation did occur, it would mean free will and randomness do not exist and both men perform the same action.
NT
NT
|