Re: Why demand logic?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If people can believe '3=1' then they may be ok but I can't and so I find any religon that claims '3=1' to be illogical.
[/ QUOTE ]
Definitely, it might be completely illogical. But if they can believe in it, as you say, it's believeable, by definition. So there's no contradiction at all with your "logical statement" : "No-one can believe something unbelievable", and therefore, in what way does any logical criticism on religion can make any sense? also, you have just agreed that this particular religion is illogical to begin with, i.e, illogical religion exists, i.e, there IS a different game.
[/ QUOTE ]
I said I don't believe anyone can believe '3=1' therefore I believe a religon that claims '3=1' is illogical. I could be wrong, maybe there are people who can believe '3=1' - what would that belief involve?
The existence of such a religon is not relevent to anything. People can say they believe it without actually believing it.
I can create a game that is unplayable, market it well and sell it to loads of people who might say they love it - but they sure aren't playing it.
Are we heading towards a conversation about cruet sets with no holes?
chez
|