[ QUOTE ]
I prob will be beaten by someone (with AA) if it turns out to be a multipot, so i try to scare them.

[/ QUOTE ]

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

215,979 games 179.765 secs 1,201 games/sec

Board:
Dead:

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 30.9036 % 30.70% 00.21% { AA }
Hand 2: 07.6864 % 06.90% 00.79% { random }
Hand 3: 07.5952 % 06.80% 00.80% { random }
Hand 4: 07.6991 % 06.90% 00.79% { random }
Hand 5: 07.7020 % 06.91% 00.79% { random }
Hand 6: 07.6367 % 06.85% 00.78% { random }
Hand 7: 07.6649 % 06.88% 00.78% { random }
Hand 8: 07.7399 % 06.95% 00.79% { random }
Hand 9: 07.6923 % 06.93% 00.76% { random }
Hand 10: 07.6799 % 06.88% 00.80% { random }

Any hand is obviously more likely to lose vs more hands, so i ran a short PS sim with AA vs 9 random hands. You need greater than 10% pot equity to call ten handed. With aces you have 30% vs ten random hands. with kings the figure drops so somewhere around 25% vs ten random calls, making that a correct call also based on pot equity and EV.

And I think risk management is a silly thing to talk about. Getting it all in with aces 3-4 handed is +++++++++EV, nothing close to betting 1:1000 on a 1:1001 shot.

aces=never fold pf