[JimmyJazz1]

A close friend of mine who plays poker told me the exact same thing today and I somewhat agree with both of you. I agree that reviewing/posting hands is 100x better since you can evaluate your play in specific post flop situations. However, stats posts can be helpful when trying to identify a particular leak that stands out. I have been posting on 2plus2 a good amount and talking with my poker buddies about hands, which has defenately helped my game. But after 38k hands i'm getting a bit frustrated about the lack of results. I know variance could bet the reason for my break even play, but there may be something else glaring that sticks out. Stats don't tell the whole story but they can help provide some details on how someone is playing. I'll shut up now, but whoever wants to help me out with my stats, please do so. Those of you who think stat posts are completely useless and are angered when they see them, just read another post.