Thread: Agression Check
View Single Post
  #6  
Old 11-07-2005, 07:21 PM
JerseyTom JerseyTom is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 21
Default Re: Agression Check

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I would probably call the 3-bet on the river.

[/ QUOTE ]
I don't get it. Do we really think SB is 3-betting OOP with the 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] or exactly J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, 66 is very likely. Considering the turn and river action and the fact that he is a TAG I can't see how we are ahead when he makes it 3 bets on the river. What would you put him on when he does that?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I guess you're right. I suppose I don't get into too many hands like this with decent players. Invariably it seems, villain has KsQs and can't believe that his flopped monster is now worthless.

I guess I'm not 3-betting 66 out of the SB vs an EP raise either... but I suppose that's a different thread altogther.


Tom
Reply With Quote