View Single Post
  #10  
Old 11-06-2005, 11:11 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why do many pros preferr limit to no limit?



Quote:
I find limit is a more boring game even though it's far more strategic than most NL players think, since its more math based and less room for fanciness
oxymoron? thats precisely why I find it far LESS strategic.

Not necessarily, just because it's far more strategic than a lot of ppl think. doesn't mean its more strategic than NL. Still, it has fields of strategies that NL doesn't offer. In limit, the lack of riskiness associated with a raise gives more room to use more tactics that a NL player wouldn't use. e.g. a check raise bluff only needs to work 10% of the time if the pot has 20 bets in it. And even if you break even you still advertise for the times when you do check raise with legitimacy.
Reply With Quote