[Xhad]

[ QUOTE ]
Point taken, yet I think you are missing the point of
the article.

[/ QUOTE ]

My comment was not on the entire article; just the specific example quoted. That's why I called it a small issue.

The point of my post was that the example quoted is either a faulty example, or a legitimate example phrased in such a way that it could lead to some dangerous misinterpretations; no one who uses poker as their sole source of income should ever be saying "I should stop for the night in case I lose my rent money."

EDIT: I think Ungoliant summed it up best here:

[ QUOTE ]
If it's the 30th of the month and this "pro" has a mortgage payment due the next day and he doesn't have enough to pay it without getting lucky at the poker table that night, he has far more serious issues to confront than whether it's okay to leave a +EV game.

[/ QUOTE ]