[dtbog]

As many have said -- well researched, nice post.

This starts to make me wonder... does UB have any legitimate grounds for righteous indignation here, or are they just an example of the squeaky wheel getting the grease?

What gives UB the right to retain its customers when they are not offering the best deal on the market? If Pokershare is offering players an incentive to play on their site (namely, rakeback + share profits), then they will be making less profit on each player than UB will -- but they intend to make up for that by attracting the bulk of the players.

What "right" does UB have to these players? Sure, they helped build the Excapsa network -- but now the Excapsa market has evolved to include a better product. UB got rich over the last 4 years through the use of one business model, but now a competitor has come along with a better one.

What am I missing here? Why did Excapsa let UB get away with this?