[A_PLUS]

I think their theory was that

$EV(X/2)*2 > $EV(X)
-for values of X around 10-15xBB

Since, half of X is more than half as valuable as X, it is correct to take -CEV gambles when the result is endign up in the red zone, b/c conventional EV models underestimate the $EV of those particular stack sizes.

Please tell me if I am wrong about my interpretation.


I do not agree with any of it, I just think I know what you are trying to say.