Re: Was are the best and worst run sites for tournaments?
My thoughts:
Ultimate would be the best, if they didn't have the bet pot button, and a shitty interface. The hands run the fastest, they have the best structure, and they have a good selection for the most part.
Partypoker isn't as bad as people say. It is still better than Pacific, and their supers have 15 minute levels which is really good.
Pacific is just a joke.
Paradise sucks IMO. They have slightly worse structure than stars on their normal tournaments, and the server is soooooo slow. You get in so many less hands on paradise, than on party or stars.
Stars is sort of considered the best site for tournaments, and I really don't think their better than UB for the tournaments themselves, but with the better interface and larger fields they make up for it. The structure is slightly better these days now that they have 800/1600, but there are still some problems. Nothing compares to the 100+ buy in structures on UB. 2500, 5/10, 15 minute levels, and LOTS of extra levels, that other sites don't have. Nothing like starting with 250 bbs...
|