I only read about 40-50 pages of this book at the B&N helping my girlfriend with her homework. I agree with the CP/BP section; interesting generic opponent modeling idea. It's something that I already do but never really articulated it to myself.

The book was somewhat hard to read for me. The one thing I disagreed with was the idea that tight games are "just as good" as loose games. Yeah, sure, your standard dev at tight-passive game might be lower than a loose-passive one (e.g. not limping w/ drawing hands, etc.), but as profitable? Maybe he was just talking up the whole idea tight games aren't all too bad.

He was talking about being such a "gambler" on the previous page or two. So he must not be scared of more flux in BR. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]