Re: declaring all-in in a limit game
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Ok so now my question is was that all in declare actually binding?
[/ QUOTE ]
No. You have to go through the motions and raise, reraise, re-reraise, re-re-raise, etc. at the limit you are playing at until you are actually out of chips (instert house rules diclaimer here).
A dealer here recently got busted by gaming for allowing a few players to "cap it" to $30 in one betting motion in a 5/5 limit game without going through raise, reraise motions.
[/ QUOTE ]
In jurisdictions with a max bet size there would be legal issues involved that would require betting in the amount of the limit.
When there are no legal issues when a pot is heads up if a player offers action and the other accepts, the action is binding (there are some that say you should trim back over bets in pot limit even heads up). If one player offers to go all in and the other player calls the first player is all-in.
|