[ptmusic]

[ QUOTE ]
Instapush. Any other move is terrible. I was trying to give the conceptual justification (Harrington), as I would move with alot less here.

1) You are ahead against a single caller which should be the BB by alot.
2) SB gets squeezed to some extent
3) Any bet is going to pot commit you so get them all in

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

2,097,572,400 games 7.343 secs 285,656,053 games/sec

Board:
Dead:

equity (%) win (%) / tie (%)

Hand 1: 44.6396 % [ 00.43 00.01 ] { random }
Hand 2: 55.3604 % [ 00.54 00.01 ] { Qh9d }


---

2,456,391,168 games 18.422 secs 133,340,091 games/sec

Board:
Dead:

equity (%) win (%) / tie (%)

Hand 1: 26.7565 % [ 00.26 00.01 ] { random }
Hand 2: 31.4494 % [ 00.30 00.02 ] { random }
Hand 3: 41.7941 % [ 00.41 00.01 ] { Qh9d }

[/ QUOTE ]

I like your final answer, but you don't (and shouldn't) put the blinds on random hands. The much bigger issue is fold equity, and as the earlier poster said, if you haven't been raising constantly and the blinds are not too loose, I'd push for sure.

Yes, you are a dog if BB calls and he's tight, but if he'll fold 80% of the time, that weighs in more to the decision.

-ptmusic