Here
[ QUOTE ]
This is one of the hardest lessons for humans to learn. We cannot admit that things might be neither good nor evil, neither cruel nor kind, but simply callous - indifferent to all suffering, lacking all purpose.
[/ QUOTE ]
Hmm, how can a man of Dawkins' undoubted intelligence apply a word like "purpose" to inanimate things?
[ QUOTE ]
The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but blind pitiless indifference.
[/ QUOTE ]
Again, the universe has no purpose? Is that intelligible? When applied to the universe?
BTW, if this is what it's like, why bother defining morality?
I also wonder since he thinks there's no design why he thinks there's order(as he's a scientist I'm guessing he believes in the order of the universe)? If the universe is undesigned, would we expect order? Isn't that what we find?