[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I guess Sklansky recognised that he won't outplay Chan in the long run

[/ QUOTE ]

I think there's about a 0% chance this was his reasoning. I'm sure if he figures himself to be a dog, he also thinks it's by a very slim margin. I'm also sure he feels that he is a favorite when the blinds become sufficiently high, which they probably are already.

[/ QUOTE ]

0% chance huh? So you are saying that Sklansky thinks he's a better player than the 10-time WSOP bracelet winner and Hall of Famer? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

When the blinds are sufficiently high, yes. When the stacks are fairly deep, I expect Sklansky would make himself out to be at most a 47/53 underdog.