Re: 77 river decision
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
sounds like a good card to raise for villain then, since he would think we're less likely to have one
[/ QUOTE ]
I can't see a passive villain raise hero without a king, especially after our here has represented a king the whole way.
[/ QUOTE ]
yeah I would definitely agree with this against even an unknown at this limit. the fact that he's passive just solidifies it. just showing the "he doesn't have one" argument goes both ways, as food for thought. this villain wouldn't think like that, though.
|