Re: A reinvention of the microposter: Session Studies
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
6: Should it be 1 for 1? That you are reviewing the same persons session who is reviewing yours. Or mix it up and tell each person who got their session, while they are reviewing someone elses session? I think 1 for 1 is less confussing so you only have to hunt down one person at a time.
As with usual session reviews I think hands that give questions or disagreement between both sender/reviwer should be posted with both players ideas expressed in the hand.
[/ QUOTE ]
I think this is a good idea. I think then, the reviewer/reviewee could get on AIM for like half an hour or hour sometime afterwards and discuss hands that they might disagree on, and then post those hands on the forum that they think might be of interest.
[/ QUOTE ]
agreed
|