View Single Post
  #8  
Old 10-14-2005, 11:01 AM
sirpupnyc sirpupnyc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 65
Default Re: The LAG vs. the WSOP Wannabe - You make the call

[ QUOTE ]
His objection is that the raiser announced a raise and brought out a stack of chips (not necessarily a stack) then dropped out a call and brought the rest of his chips back to get more chips -- as opposed to announcing raise coming out with the $20 call only and then coming back.

[/ QUOTE ]

You may be right, but I don't think the OP says that. There's no mention of coming out with a stack of, say, $50, dropping $20 and then going back with $30 to get another $50.

In any case, LAG seems to be perfectly acceptable here. Let me guess...after all that, wannabe folded?

Could/should the (second) floor have quietly taken wannabe aside and said "Look, the (first) floor has ruled, that's final, no amount of bitching and moaning is going to change that"? We seem to get lots of these stories about guys who are convinced they're right and that if they just get to explain to the right manager they'll be able to prove it, not understanding that even if they *are* actually right, the first manager on the scene is the one who counts.
Reply With Quote