This is very funny as I was just having this discussion on a non-poker basketball board - but the question is "which is more profitable?"

I would argue that for most players, limit is actually more profitable because it is easier to find the edges and exploit them - in no limit, you have to be extremely skilled and be able to read really well if you want to succeed.

So what do you all think? Which is more profitable for the average player? limit or no limit?