[crunchy1]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Do you know the meaning of the word 'source'? Do you understand the context I used it in?
Pros generate action, that's all. Over the long term a profitable pro IS NOT a source of rake. Please get back to me when you can understand this fairly simple concept. Thank you.

[/ QUOTE ]

To find the truth of this, would Party make less revenue and profit if the 10% who generate 70% of the income stopped playing?

[/ QUOTE ]
Yes, Party would make less revenue because they have now lost 10% of their player base.

However, the 10%/70% ratio would remain. Out of the remaining 90% of the player base a new 10% subset of those players would now be the winning, high volume players. It would be this new subset of players that will now be the ones generating the majority (~70%) of the rake.